Should AIDS Information be public record? - aids information more condition_symptoms
AIDS information, including statistics and prevention as a public document already is.
If you ask about the personal diagnosis, we should ask ourselves why? How important is it for you if your neighbor or a colleague is HIV positive or have AIDS ... If you do not have sex with them too badly.
Even if you have sex with an unknown partner, it's your job to protect your health as much as possible, guided safer sex and contraception methods.
Disclosure of the names of infected people is synonymous with the brand, so attacking them open to discrimination. There is simply no compelling reason to do so.
And for the man who believes that the card issuing HIV is a good idea, it is valid until your next sexual encounter without protection and can confirm that 6 weeks ago. It is possible that a person has unprotected week 1, week 2-test negative and then develop HIV antibodies 4 weeks, two weeks after the negative result, with a useless card.
Aids Information More Condition_symptoms Should AIDS Information Be Public Record?
5 comments:
AIDS information for educational purposes and should be accessible to the public. You can find information online or tonnes if a local group of AIDS prevention. However, information about people with HIV / AIDS must be protected because some people discriminate against people with HIV.
No, because people use this information to discriminate against people with AIDS.
No way. But I think if you test that you should have a card with the date on which the authorization to give that negative results. Thus, one can show the card to a potential partner.
Taking all his senses, he can appear on the surface, as it would be great if you could check the public records to see if a potential partner has HIV. But if you really want to know your employer, your future employer and any other person in the world? What a nightmare. I come to the side to keep private.
I think it should:)
Post a Comment